Several years ago we had to decide what kind of piano to buy for our children. Electronic keyboards were attractive because of their size, economy and versatility. But most reviews I read compared them to “real pianos.” (“Sounds almost like a real piano.”) This raised the question: if you’re looking for a product being judged by its resemblance to another product, why not buy the one that sets the standard? That’s what we did. We bought, and still have, a sturdy Hamilton upright piano.
The current discussion surrounding Kindles and other e-book readers brought this to mind. So many assessments I read and hear about these products compare them to “real” books, usually unfavorably. Their resolution is not as good. Their graphics are anemic. You don’t know what page you’re on. Etc. The e-book’s admitted edge in compactness isn’t enough for a real book lover. For them, nothing will replace printed books. They’re irreplaceable; a superb vehicle for delivering text. Instead of asking whether printed books will disappear, we might better ask, “How will writing reach readers in the future?” Conventional books will certainly be one vehicle. E-books will be another. But their form will evolve into something quite different than books-on-a-screen.
Recall how automobiles evolved. Early versions looked like buckboard wagons with engines attached. It was decades before cars began to resemble a new product altogether. Similarly, when it was first introduced at the New York World’s Fair in 1939, television was viewed as an extension of radio (it was even called “illustrated radio”). Early news broadcasters read copy before cameras, looking down at the paper in their hands, as if they were still in a radio studio. It took a couple of decades for television to become a medium all its own.
The same thing will happen with e-books. Today they look like conventional books on a screen. In time, just like cars and television, e-books will find their own form. Their length will vary more than conventional ones; they’ll be shorter on average, with more varied formats, more flexibility, more fluidity, and a wider range of prices. Short stories and novellas are better suited to the e-book format than novels. Articles and essays work better on their small screens than full-scale nonfiction books. E-books might be updated on a regular basis, and perhaps incorporate reader feedback, or author-reader dialogue. The possibilities are infinite, and intriguing.
Reposted with permission: RalphKeyes.com
Friday, August 7, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I used to read the New York Times every morning on my Long Island Rail Road commute to Manhattan. I would arrive with newsprint all over my hands. Frequently, I would suffer a sneezing jag, because I was allergic to the fresh ink.
Ever since I first heard about Kindles, I imagined commuters reading the Times electronically. I'm not sure how they work, but I envisioned downloading the paper from a satellite on my ten minute walk to the station.
The art of folding the paper, so as not to infringe on the person in the seat next to you, however, will be lost forever.
Inked fingers & clumsy newspaper folding won't be missed. But a recent article by Nicholas Baker in the New Yorker raises serious questions about how much of a newspaper-substitute (or book alternative) the Kindle is, so far anyway.690omar
The Kindle is an interesting product, but it is still too bulky for my tastes. I'd much rather carry the flexible news paper than a stiff CRT. Once the display technology advances to a flexible medium, then things will really get interesting: suddenly you can roll or fold them up. Then they'll fit nicely into a small purse or be carried on one of those Batman utility belt slots that used to hold our cell phones.
After a pipe in our attic burst last winter, we had to pack up and temporarily move all our books (and bookshelves). I have to admit, the Kindle started to sound pretty good by the 15th box. But even if I bought and loved the Kindle, Amazon is not going to put all my existing books on it for free. Just like with other format changes (VHS to DVD, albums to tapes to CDs to digital) we'd always end up owning multiple formats anyway.
Good point, Kim. And I must admit the thousands of books we'd have to move if & when we change houses makes the Kindle look attractive. Michael, there is a flexible, roll-up e-reader on the horizon if it's not out already.
Post a Comment